Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDumornay, W
dc.contributor.authorRoblin, P M
dc.contributor.authorGelling, M
dc.contributor.authorHammerschlag, M R
dc.contributor.authorWorku, M
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T15:37:46Z
dc.date.available2023-06-29T15:37:46Z
dc.date.issued1992-07
dc.identifier.citationDumornay W, Roblin PM, Gelling M, Hammerschlag MR, Worku M. Comparison of a chemiluminometric immunoassay with culture for diagnosis of chlamydial infections in infants. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Jul;30(7):1867-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1867-1869.1992. PMID: 1629345; PMCID: PMC265395.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0095-1137
dc.identifier.pmid1629345
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/10328
dc.description.abstractThe performance of Magic Lite (CIBA-Corning), a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA), was compared with that of culture for the diagnosis of neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis and respiratory infection. We performed a retrospective evaluation of 51 ocular and 96 nasopharyngeal specimens previously collected for culture testing with the CIA. The sensitivities for the ocular and the nasopharyngeal specimens were 91 and 91.7%, respectively. The specificities for both sites were 100%. A subsequent prospective study evaluating 71 ocular and 38 nasopharyngeal specimens revealed sensitivities of 83.3 and 20%, respectively. The specificities for both sites were 100%. The CIA performed favorably, compared with culture, for the diagnosis of chlamydial conjunctivitis; however, the CIA appeared less sensitive for the diagnosis of respiratory infection, including pneumonia.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/epdf/10.1128/jcm.30.7.1867-1869.1992en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleComparison of a chemiluminometric immunoassay with culture for diagnosis of chlamydial infections in infants.en_US
dc.typeArticle/Reviewen_US
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of clinical microbiologyen_US
dc.source.volume30
dc.source.issue7
dc.source.beginpage1867
dc.source.endpage9
dc.source.countryUnited States
dc.description.versionVoRen_US
refterms.dateFOA2023-06-29T15:37:47Z
html.description.abstractThe performance of Magic Lite (CIBA-Corning), a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CIA), was compared with that of culture for the diagnosis of neonatal chlamydial conjunctivitis and respiratory infection. We performed a retrospective evaluation of 51 ocular and 96 nasopharyngeal specimens previously collected for culture testing with the CIA. The sensitivities for the ocular and the nasopharyngeal specimens were 91 and 91.7%, respectively. The specificities for both sites were 100%. A subsequent prospective study evaluating 71 ocular and 38 nasopharyngeal specimens revealed sensitivities of 83.3 and 20%, respectively. The specificities for both sites were 100%. The CIA performed favorably, compared with culture, for the diagnosis of chlamydial conjunctivitis; however, the CIA appeared less sensitive for the diagnosis of respiratory infection, including pneumonia.
dc.description.institutionSUNY Downstateen_US
dc.description.departmentPediatricsen_US
dc.description.degreelevelN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.journalJournal of clinical microbiology
dc.identifier.issue7en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
jcm.30.7.1867-1869.1992.pdf
Size:
474.8Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International