Loading...
Journal Title
Readers/Advisors
Orr, Susan
Journal Title
Term and Year
Publication Date
2021-05
Book Title
Publication Volume
Publication Issue
Publication Begin
Publication End
Number of pages
Collections
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Over the last century, the Supreme Court’s decisions have become increasingly salient to the
public, as they regard some of the most polarized topics in American politics. This has prompted
serious concern for the institution’s legitimacy. What if citizens begin to view the Court as
political as they do the Presidency and Congress? The judicial branch will then no longer be seen
as possessing a distinct role in American politics—a role premised on the perception that the
Court exercises legal rather than political reasoning. This study will use a survey to determine to
what extent the approaches to constitutional interpretation are seen by the public as a proxy for
ideology. It will further seek to discover whether average citizens can take their preferred
approaches to interpreting the Constitution and apply them to Supreme Court case decisions. If
findings reveal that the public consistently conflate ideology and interpretive stances, then the
Court’s legitimacy in the public mind is increasingly contingent on politics itself rather than the
Court’s ability to remain above politics as an independent institution.