Mastrokostas, Paul
Loading...
Biography
Paul Mastrokostas is a medical student in the Class of 2026 at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University in Brooklyn, NY. He graduated from the Coordinated BA-MD program at Brooklyn College in 2022 with a Bachelor of Arts in Chemistry and a Bachelor of Business Administration in Health Professions. During his undergraduate years, his focus primarily revolved around basic science investigations, particularly the metabolic properties of bone in mediating glucose homeostasis. Upon transitioning to medical school, Paul’s research interests evolved to encompass a more clinically oriented approach. With aspirations of pursuing an orthopaedic surgery, Paul's recent efforts focus on creating and utilizing prognostic models to inform treatment choices for intricate orthopaedic spine and trauma cases. His current research includes developing machine learning models to predict surgical outcomes, analyzing the economic implications of various surgical techniques, and exploring the use of advanced statistical methods to improve patient care. Paul’s work aims to provide data-driven insights that can enhance clinical decision-making and optimize treatment strategies for patients with orthopaedic injuries.
6 results
Publication Search Results
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Publication Open Access Lead induced differences in bone properties in osteocalcin +/+ and −/− female mice(Elsevier BV, 2023-06) Yildirim, G.; Budell, W.C.; Berezovska, O.; Yagerman, S.; Maliath, S.S.; Mastrokostas, P.; Tommasini, S.; Dowd, T.L.Lead (Pb) toxicity is a major health problem and bone is the major reservoir. Lead is detrimental to bone, affects bone remodeling and is associated with elderly fractures. Osteocalcin (OC) affects bone remodeling, improves fracture resistance and decreases with age and in some diseases. The effect of lead in osteocalcin depleted bone is unknown and of interest. We compared bone mineral properties of control and Pb exposed (from 2 to 6 months) femora from female adult C57BL6 OC+/+ and OC-/- mice using Fourier Transform Infrared Imaging (FTIRI), Micro-computed tomography (uCT), bone biomechanical measurements and serum turnover markers (P1NP, CTX). Lead significantly increased turnover in OC+/+ and in OC-/- bones producing increased total volume, area and marrow area/total area with decreased BV/TV compared to controls. The increased turnover decreased mineral/matrix vs. Oc+/+ and increased mineral/matrix and crystallinity vs. OC-/-. PbOC-/- had increased bone formation, cross-sectional area (Imin) and decreased collagen maturity compared OC-/- and PbOC+/+. Imbalanced turnover in PbOC-/- confirmed the role of osteocalcin as a coupler of formation and resorption. Bone strength and stiffness were reduced in OC-/- and PbOC-/- due to reduced material properties vs. OC+/+ and PbOC+/+ respectively. The PbOC-/- bones had increased area to compensate for weaker material properties but were not proportionally stronger for increased size. However, at low lead levels osteocalcin plays the major role in bone strength suggesting increased fracture risk in low Pb2+ exposed elderly could be due to reduced osteocalcin as well. Years of low lead exposure or higher blood lead levels may have an additional effect on bone strength.Publication Open Access Reevaluating Informed Consent: Integrating Shared Decision-Making into Spinal Surgery for Better Patient Outcomes(SAGE Publications, 2024-10-26) Wang, Jeffrey N.; Elhakeem, Mohamed A.; Mesimer, Matthew J.; Mastrokostas, Paul G.; Ahmad, Salman; Reed, Tim; Klein, Brandon; Bartlett, Lucas E.; Bitterman, Adam D.; Megas, AndrewStudy design: Narrative review. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to answer the following questions: (1) What is the quality of informed consent in spine surgery, including both neurosurgery and orthopaedic spine surgery? (2) What limitations impede the ability of surgeons to engage in effective shared decision-making (SDM) and obtain adequate informed consent? (3) What strategies and solutions may improve the quality of informed consent and SDM? (4) What factors decrease the incidence of litigation in spine surgery? Methods: N/A. Results: SDM is a collaborative process where patients are involved in their treatment choices through open communication about risks, alternatives, and postoperative expectations. Informed consent is a vital component of this process, ensuring that patients are fully informed and empowered to make decisions based on their values and preferences. This review highlights the current state of informed consent within the context of SDM in spine surgery and explores how enhancing this process can improve patient outcomes, reduce dissatisfaction, and decrease litigation. By emphasizing patient autonomy and improving the quality of risk communication, SDM fosters better physician-patient relationships and more positive clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery are highly litigated specialties, with failure to obtain informed consent frequently cited in lawsuits. These legal challenges are costly and time-consuming for both physicians and patients. Integrating SDM into the informed consent process can help mitigate these issues, leading to improved patient satisfaction and fewer legal disputes.Publication Open Access Publication rates of abstracts presented at American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual open and closed conferences: 2015-2019(Elsevier BV, 2024-05) Mastrokostas, Paul G.; Klein, Brandon; Cappellino, Anthony L.; Bartlett, Lucas E.; Parada, Stephen A.; Cohn, Randy M.Background: The annual meetings hosted by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) present the latest prepublication literature in shoulder and elbow surgery, facilitating early dissemination of novel findings that impact clinical decision-making. Evaluating the publication rate of presented abstracts at ASES conferences becomes crucial in assessing the quality of research showcased, as these presentations often precede the peer-review process. Methods: The ASES conference programs from 2015-2019 were reviewed to identify presented abstracts. For each abstract, the title, author(s), conference year, and meeting type (open vs. closed) were recorded. The names of the author(s) of each abstract were searched in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to determine if there was an associated published manuscript. For each identified manuscript, the title, author(s), date of publication, publishing journal, impact factor of the publishing journal, level of evidence, and number of citations were recorded. Results: A total of 316 abstracts were presented as podium lectures at ASES open and closed meetings between 2015 and 2019. Within 3 years of presentation, 240 (75.9%) of the presented abstracts resulted in publication. There was an increase in the proportion of abstracts resulting in publication within 3 years of the presentation from 2015-2019 (R = 0.8733, P = .053). Overall, the proportion of presented abstracts that went on to publication in peer-reviewed journals also increased (R = 0.8907, P = .043). Manuscripts of abstracts presented at open meetings had a shorter time to publication (8.78 vs. 11.82 months; P = .0160) and were cited more often (40.89 vs. 30.11, P = .0099) than those presented at closed meetings. Conclusion: There has been an increase in the publication rate of abstracts presented at ASES annual meetings in the study period. Published manuscripts of abstracts presented at ASES open conferences were published faster, and were cited more often, than closed conferences. ASES conferences allow for the presentation of high-quality prepublication literature in shoulder and elbow surgery.Publication Open Access Obstructive Sleep Apnea is Associated With Increased Rates of Acute Respiratory Failure, Length of Stay, and Hospital Costs in Patients Undergoing Elective Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion(SAGE Publications, 2025-03-28) Mastrokostas, Paul G.; Said, Mohamed; Cassar, Christian; Mastrokostas, Leonidas E.; Lavi, Aaron B.; Varthi, Arya; Bou Monsef, Jad; Razi, Afshin E.; Ng, Mitchell K.Study designRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo examine differences in postoperative complications, recovery course, and costs between patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).MethodsThe National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried to identify patients undergoing single-level ACDF between 2016 and 2022. After exclusions, patients were divided into OSA and control groups. Propensity score matching (1:2) controlled for age, sex, obesity, and year of surgery to balance characteristics. Postoperative outcomes, including complications, length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, and discharge disposition, were compared using chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. A Bonferroni correction was applied, with significance set at P < 0.002.ResultsA total of 36,000 matched cases were analyzed (12,000 OSA and 24,000 controls). OSA patients had significantly higher rates of acute respiratory failure (4.7% vs 1.9%; P < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation (1.5% vs 0.6%; P < 0.001). The OSA cohort also had a longer LOS (2.3 vs 1.9 days; P < 0.001), higher hospital costs ($23,300 vs $21,100; P < 0.001), and greater non-routine discharge rates (20.4% vs 16.8%; P < 0.001).ConclusionsOSA is associated with increased respiratory complications, prolonged LOS, and higher costs in single-level ACDF. These findings underscore the importance of preoperative screening and tailored perioperative management to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.Publication Open Access GPT-4 as a Source of Patient Information for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Comparative Analysis Against Google Web Search(SAGE Publications, 2024-03-21) Mastrokostas, Paul G.; Mastrokostas, Leonidas E.; Emara, Ahmed K.; Wellington, Ian J.; Ginalis, Elizabeth; Houten, John K.; Khalsa, Amrit S.; Saleh, Ahmed; Razi, Afshin E.; Ng, Mitchell K.Study design: Comparative study. Objectives: This study aims to compare Google and GPT-4 in terms of (1) question types, (2) response readability, (3) source quality, and (4) numerical response accuracy for the top 10 most frequently asked questions (FAQs) about anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: "Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion" was searched on Google and GPT-4 on December 18, 2023. Top 10 FAQs were classified according to the Rothwell system. Source quality was evaluated using JAMA benchmark criteria and readability was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid grade level. Differences in JAMA scores, Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Flesch Reading Ease, and word count between platforms were analyzed using Student's t-tests. Statistical significance was set at the .05 level. Results: Frequently asked questions from Google were varied, while GPT-4 focused on technical details and indications/management. GPT-4 showed a higher Flesch-Kincaid grade level (12.96 vs 9.28, P = .003), lower Flesch Reading Ease score (37.07 vs 54.85, P = .005), and higher JAMA scores for source quality (3.333 vs 1.800, P = .016). Numerically, 6 out of 10 responses varied between platforms, with GPT-4 providing broader recovery timelines for ACDF. Conclusions: This study demonstrates GPT-4's ability to elevate patient education by providing high-quality, diverse information tailored to those with advanced literacy levels. As AI technology evolves, refining these tools for accuracy and user-friendliness remains crucial, catering to patients' varying literacy levels and information needs in spine surgery.Publication Open Access Modern Internet Search Analytics: Is There a Difference in What Patients are Searching Regarding the Operative and Nonoperative Management of Scoliosis?(SAGE Publications, 2024-04-13) Mastrokostas, Paul G.; Mastrokostas, Leonidas E.; Emara, Ahmed K.; Wellington, Ian J.; Ginalis, Elizabeth; Houten, John K.; Khalsa, Amrit S.; Saleh, Ahmed; Razi, Afshin E.; Ng, Mitchell K.Study design: Observational Study. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the most searched types of questions and online resources implicated in the operative and nonoperative management of scoliosis. Methods: Six terms related to operative and nonoperative scoliosis treatment were searched on Google's People Also Ask section on October 12, 2023. The Rothwell classification was used to sort questions into fact, policy, or value categories, and associated websites were classified by type. Fischer's exact tests compared question type and websites encountered between operative and nonoperative questions. Statistical significance was set at the .05 level. Results: The most common questions concerning operative and nonoperative management were fact (53.4%) and value (35.5%) questions, respectively. The most common subcategory pertaining to operative and nonoperative questions were specific activities/restrictions (21.7%) and evaluation of treatment (33.3%), respectively. Questions on indications/management (13.2% vs 31.2%, P < .001) and evaluation of treatment (10.1% vs 33.3%, P < .001) were associated with nonoperative scoliosis management. Medical practice websites were the most common website to which questions concerning operative (31.9%) and nonoperative (51.4%) management were directed to. Operative questions were more likely to be directed to academic websites (21.7% vs 10.0%, P = .037) and less likely to be directed to medical practice websites (31.9% vs 51.4%, P = .007) than nonoperative questions. Conclusions: During scoliosis consultations, spine surgeons should emphasize the postoperative recovery process and efficacy of conservative treatment modalities for the operative and nonoperative management of scoliosis, respectively. Future research should assess the impact of website encounters on patients' decision-making.
